• Strategic Research Cluster
• Home
• Team
• Field Survey
  • Contexts for electronic book research
    • Audience
    • Interface and design
    • Form and content
  • Proposed research
    • User studies
    • Importance of user studies
    • Previous studies
• Features and uses
  • Features of books and e-books
  • Uses of books and e-books
    • Uses of books
    • Uses of e-books
    • Digital archives
• Aspects of the book
  • Material aspects
  • Symbolic aspects
  • Formal aspects
• Prototyping
  • Interface
  • Preservation
  • Encoding issues
  • Textual analysis
  • Reading tools
  • Media and platforms
  • Reading culture
• Bibliography

Works Cited

• Astleitner, H., & Leutner, D. (1995). "Learning Strategies for Unstructured Hypermedia – A Framework for Theory, Research, and Practice." Journal of Educational Computing Research 13(4): 387-400.
• Barrett, A. (2005) "The Information-Seeking Habits of Graduate Student Researchers in the Humanities." Journal of Academic Librarianship 31(4): 324-331.
• Barthes, R. (1974). S/Z. R. Millar, Trans. New York: Hill and Wang.
• Bates, M. J. (2002). "The Cascade of Interactions in the Digital Library Interface." Information Processing & Management 38(3): 381-400.
• Beagrie, N., & Jones, M. (2002). Preservation Management of Digital Materials: A Handbook. Digital Preservation Coalition.
• Best, Michael, ed. (1998). The Internet Shakespeare: Opportunities in a New Medium. Spec. issue of Early Modern Literary Studies 3(3): <http://extra.shu.ac.uk/emls/si-02/si-02toc.html>.
• Best, Michael (2004). “Introduction: A Booth at the Fair.” Monitoring Electronic Shakespeares. Spec. issue of Early Modern Literary Studies 9.3: <http://extra.shu.ac.uk/emls/09-3/bestintr.htm>.
• Blandford, A., Rimmer, J. & Warwick, C. (2006). "Experiences of the Library in the Digital Age." Proceedings of the Third International Conference on "Cultural Covergence and Digital Technology". Athens.
• Bolter, Jay David (2001). Writing Space: Computers, Hypertext, and the Remediation of Print. 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• British Academy (2005). E-resources for Research in the Humanities and Social Sciences - A British Academy Policy Review: <http://www.britac.ac.uk/reports/eresources/report/sect3.html#part5>.
• Buzzetti, Dino, and Jerome McGann. "Electronic Textual Editing: Critical Editing in a Digital Horizon." Electronic Textual Editing. Text Encoding Initiative Consortium: <http://www.tei-c.org/Activities/ETE/Preview/mcgann.xml>.
• Caplan, P. “Preservation metadata.” Digital Curation Manual: <http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resource/curation-manual/chapters/preservation-metadata/preservation-metadata.pdf>.
• Carroll, John M. (2002). “Introduction: Human-Computer Interaction, the Past and the Present.” Human-Computer Interaction in the New Millennium. Ed. Carroll. New York: ACM Press; Boston: Addison Wesley.
• Chartier, Roger (1994). The Order of Books. Trans. Lydia G. Cochrane. Stanford: Polity Press.
• Chatman, S. (1978). Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. New York: Cornell University Press.
• Cheypesh, Oksana, Constanza Pacher, Sandra Gabriele, Stéfan Sinclair, Drew Paulin and Stan Ruecker (2006). “Centering the Mind and Calming the Heart: Mandalas as Interfaces.” Society for Digital Humanities (SDH/SEMI). York University, Toronto. May 29-31.
• Chu, C. M. (1999). "Literary Critics at Work and their Information Needs: A Research-Phases Model." Library & Information Science Research 21(2): 247-273.
• Dalcher, D. and Genus, A. (2003). "Introduction: Avoiding IS/IT Implementation Failure." Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 15(4): 403-407.
• Dalton, M. S, and Charnigo, L. (2004). "Historians and their information sources." College & Research Libraries 65(5): 400-425.
• Day, M. (2005). “Metadata.” Digital Curation Manual: <http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resource/curation-manual/chapters/metadata/metadata.pdf>.
• DeRose, Steven J., David G. Durand, Elli Mylonas, and Allen H. Renear (1990). “What Is Text, Really?” Journal of Computing in Higher Education 1(2): 3-26.
• Derrida, Jacques (1976). Of Grammatology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Derrida, Jacques (1981). Dissemination. Trans. Barbara Johnson. Chicago: University Press.
• Dillon, Andrew (2004). Designing Usable Electronic Text. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
• Dobson, T.M. (2006). "For the Love of a Good Narrative: Digitality and Textuality." English Teaching: Practice and Critique 5(2): 56-68.
• Dobson, T.M. & Luce-Kapler, R. (2005). "Stitching Texts: Gender and Geography in Frankenstein and Patchwork Girl." Changing English 12(2): 265-277.
• Dobson, T.M. & Miall, D.S. (1998). “Orienting the Reader?: A Study of Literary Hypertexts." SPIEL 17(2): 249-262.
• Douglas, J. Y. (2000). The End of Books – Or Books Without End?: Reading Interactive Narratives. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
• Duff, W. (2003). "Metadata in Digital Preservation: Foundations, Functions and Issues." Metadata in Preservation: Selected Papers from an ERPANET Seminar at the Archives School Marburg, ed. F. M. Bischoff, H. Hofman and S. Ross. Marburg: Archivschule Marburg.
• Eco, Umberto (1992). Interpretation and Overinterpretation. Ed. S. Collini. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Ellis, D. and Oldman H. (2005). "The English Literature Researcher in the Age of the Internet." Journal of Information Science 31(1): 29-36.
• Fitzgerald, J. & Shanahan, T. (2000). "Reading and Writing Relations and their Development." Educational Psychologist 35(1): 39-50.
• Flowers, S. (1996). Software Failure: Management Failure: Amazing Stories and Cautionary Tales. Chichester, NY: John Wiley.
• Foss, C. (1989). "Tools for Reading and Browsing Hypertext." Information Processing and Management 25(4): 407-418.
• Frascara, J. (1997). User-Centred Graphic Design. London: Taylor and Francis.
• Galey, Alan (2004). "Dizzying the Arithmetic of Memory: Shakespearean Source Documents as Text, Image, and Code." Early Modern Literary Studies 9.3 / Special Issue 12: 4.1-28, <http://purl.oclc.org/emls/09-3/galedizz.htm>.
• Ganong, W.F. (2003). Review of Medical Physiology. 21st ed. New York: Lange Medical Books.
• Garrett, Jesse James. “Ajax: A New Approach to Web Applications.” Adaptive Path. <http://www.adaptivepath.com/publications/essays/archives/>.
• Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
• Granger, S. (2000). "Emulation as a Digital Preservation Strategy." D-Lib Magazine 6(10).
• Green, R. (2000). "Locating Sources in Humanities Scholarship: The Efficacy of Following Bibliographic References." Library Quarterly 70(2): 201-229.
• Greetham, D.C. (1994). Textual Scholarship: An Introduction. New York: Garland.
• Greetham, D.C. (1997). The Margins of the Text. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
• Hansen, W. J. (1971). "User Engineering Principles for Interactive Systems." Proceedings of AFIPS Fall Joint Computer Conference 39: 523-532.
• Hedstrom, M. L., Lee, C. A., Olson, J. S., & Lampe, C. A. (2006). "'The Old Version Flickers More': Digital Preservation from the User's Perspective." American Archivist 69: 159-187.
• Ingwersen, P., & Jarvelin, K. (2005). The Turn: Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context, vol. 18. Berlin: Springer.
• Iser, W. (1978). The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Johns, Adrian (1998). The Nature of the Book: Print and Knowledge in the Making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Kim, H., & Hirtle, S. C. (1995). "Spatial Metaphors and Disorientation in Hypertext Browsing." Behaviour & Information Technology 14(4): 239-250.
• Kintsch, W. (1988). "The Role of Knowledge in Discourse Comprehension: A Construction Integration Model." Psychological Review 95(2):163-182.
• Kirschenbaum, Matthew G. (2004a). “Extreme Inscription: Towards a Grammatology of the Hard Drive.” TEXT Technology 13(2): 91-125.
• Kirschenbaum, Matthew G. (2004b). “‘So the Colors Cover the Wires’: Interface, Aesthetics, and Usability.” A Companion to Digital Humanities. Ed. Susan Schreibman, Ray Siemens, and John Unsworth. Malden, MA: Blackwell. 523-42.
• Landow, George (1994). Hyper/Text/Theory. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Landow, George (1997). Hypertext 2.0: The Convergence of Contemporary Critical Theory and Technology. Rev. ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Lavoie, B. F., and R. Gartner (2005). Preservation Metadata (No. 05-01). Digital Preservation Coalition, 2005.
• Lazinger, S. (2001). Digital Preservation and Metadata. Englewood: Greenwood.
• Lehmann, S. & Renfro, P. (1991). "Humanists and Electronic Information Services: Acceptance and Resistance." College and Research Libraries 52: 403-413.
• Leventhal, L. M., B. M. Teasley, K. Instone, D. S. Rohlman and J. Farhat (1993). "Sleuthing in HyperHolmes: An Evaluation of Using Hypertext vs. a Book to Answer Questions." Behaviour and Information Technology 12: 149-164.
• Linden, J., S. Martin, R. Masters and R. Parker (2005). The Large Scale Archival Storage of Digital Objects. Digital Preservation Coalition.
• Luce-Kapler, R. and T. M. Dobson. (2005) "In Search of a Story: Reading and Writing e-Literature." Reading Online 8(6): np.
• Maclean, Marie (1991). "Pretexts and Paratexts: The Art of the Peripheral." New Literary History 22(2): 273-9.
• Makri, S., A. Blandford, G. Buchanan, J. Gow, J. Rimmer and C. Warwick. "A Library or Just another Information Resource? A Case Study of Users’ Mental Models of Traditional and Digital Libraries." Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology. In press as of Fall 2006.
• McKenzie, D.F. (1999). “The Broken Phial: Non-Book Texts.” Bibliography and the Sociology of Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 31-53.
• Miall, D. S. and T. M. Dobson (2001). "Reading Hypertext and the Experience of Literature." Journal of Digital Information 2(1).
• Miall, D. S., and D. Kuiken (1994). "Beyond Text Theory: Understanding Literary Response." Discourse Processes 17: 337-352.
• Rabinowitz, P. J. (1987). Before Reading: Narrative Conventions and the Politics of Interpretation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
• Renear, Allen (1997). “Out of Praxis: Three (Meta)Theories of Textuality.” Electronic Text: Investigations in Method and Theory. Ed. Kathryn Sutherland. Oxford: Clarendon. 107-26.
• Rose, Jonathan (1995). “Worker’s Journals.” Victorian Periodicals and Victorian Society. Ed. J. Don Vann and Rosemary T. VanArsdel. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 301-310.
• Rosenblatt, L. (1938/1968). Literature as Exploration. New York: Noble and Noble.
• Rosenberg, M.E. (1994). "Physics and Hypertext: Liberation and Complicity in Art and Pedagogy." Hyper / Text / Theory. Ed. George Landow. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press. 268-298.
• Ross, S. (2002). "How to Preserve and Prove the Integrity of Digital Objects?" DigiCULT Thematic Issue: Integrity and Authenticity of Digital Cultural Heritage Objects.
• Rouet, J. F. & Levonen, J. J. (1996). "Studying and Learning with Hypertext: Empirical Studies and their Implications." Hypertext and Cognition. Ed. J. F. Rouet, J. J. Levonen, A. Dillon, & R. J. Spiro. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 9-23.
• Ruecker, Stan (2003). Affordances of Prospect for Academic Users of Interpretively-tagged Text Collections. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. Edmonton: University of Alberta.
• Ruecker, Stan (2005). “The Electronic Book Table of Contents as a Research Tool.” Congress of the Humanities and Social Sciences: Consortium for Computers in the Humanities / Consortium pour Ordinateurs en Sciences Humaines (COCH/COSH) Annual Conference. London, Ontario.
• Ruecker, Stan (2006). “Proposing an Affordance Strength Model to Study New Interface Tools.” Digital Humanities 2006, Paris, France.
• Ruecker, Stan, Ximena Rossello, Greg Lord, and Milena Radzikowska (2006). “The Clear Browser: Visually Positioning an Interface for Data Mining by Humanities Scholars.” Digital Humanities 2006, Paris, France.
• Schreibman, Susan (2002). "Computer-Mediated Texts and Textuality: Theory and Practice." Computers and the Humanities 36: 283-93.
• Shneiderman, B. & Plaisant, C. (2005). Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human Computer Interaction. 4th Ed. Reading, Mass.: Pearson – Addison Wesley.
• Siegfried, S., M. J. Bates and D. N. Wilde (1993). "A Profile of End-User Searching Behavior by Humanities Scholars: The Getty Online Searching Project Report no. 2.", Journal of the American Society for Information Science 44(5): 273-291.
• Siemens, R.G. et al. (2002). “The Credibility of Electronic Publishing: A Report to the Humanities and Social Sciences Federation of Canada.” TEXT Technology 11(1): 1-128.
• Sless, D. and R. Wiseman (1997). Writing About Medicines for People. 2nd ed. Melbourne: Communication Research Institute of Australia.
• Slights, William W. E. (2001). Managing Readers: Printed Marginalia in English Renaissance Books. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
• Spufford, Margaret (1982). Small Books and Pleasant Histories: Popular Fiction and its Readership in Seventeenth Century England. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
• Steemson, M. (2002). "DigiCult Experts Search for e-Archive Permanence." DigiCULT Thematic Issue: Integrity and Authenticity of Digital Cultural Heritage Objects.
• Stone, S. (1982). "Humanities Scholars-Information Needs and Uses." Journal of Documentation 38(4): 292-313.
• Stotsky, S. (1983). "Research on Reading/Writing Relationships: A Synthesis and Suggested Directions." Language Arts 60: 627-643.
• Talja, S. and J. Maula (2003). "Reasons for the Use and Non-Use of Electronic Journals and Databases – A Domain Analytic Study in Four Scholarly Disciplines." Journal of Documentation 59(6): 273-291.
• Thérien, G. (1985). Sémiologies. Montréal: Université du Québec à Montréal.
• Van Peer, W. & Chatman, S., ed. (2001). New Perspectives on Narrative Perspective. New York: SUNY.
• Warwick, Claire (2004). “Print Scholarship and Digital Resources.” A Companion to Digital Humanities. Ed. Susan Schreibman, Ray Siemens, and John Unsworth. London: Blackwell. 366-82.
• Warwick, C., A. Blandford and G. Buchanan (2005). "User Centred Interactive Search: A Study of Humanities Users in a Digital Library Environment." Association for Computers and the Humanities- Association for Literary and Linguistic Computing 2005. University of Victoria, Canada.
• Warwick, C., M. Terras, P. Huntington and N. Pappa (2006). “'If You Build It Will They Come?' The LAIRAH Study: Quantifying the Use of Online Resources in the Arts and Humanities Through Statistical Analysis of UserLog Data." Proceedings of Digital Humanities 2006. Paris: Universite de Paris-Sorbonne. 225-228.
• Warwick, C., M. Terras, P. Huntington, N. Pappa and I. Galina. The LAIRAH Survey, A Report to the Arts and Humanities Research Council: AHRC ICT Strategy Scheme. Forthcoming as of Fall 2006.
• Waters, D. and J. Garret (1996). Preserving Digital Information: Report of the Task Force on Archiving of Digital Information. Commission on Preservation and Access and the Research Libraries Group.
• Watson-Boone, R. (1994). "The Information Needs and Habits of Humanities Scholars." Reference Quarterly 34: 203-216.
• Watt, Tessa (1991). Cheap Print and Popular Piety, 1550-1640. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Whitmire, E. (2002). "Disciplinary Differences and Undergraduates' Information-Seeking Behaviour." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53(8): 631-638.
• Wiberley, S. E. (1983). "Subject Access in the Humanities and the Precision of the Humanist’s Vocabulary." Library Quarterly 53: 420-433.
• Wilberley, S. E. (1988). "Names in Space and Time: The Indexing vocabulary of the Humanities." Library Quarterly 58: 1-28.
• Wiberley, S. (2000). "Time and Technology." College and Research Libraries 61(5): 421-431.
• Zwaan, R. A., J. Magliano and A. C. Gaesser (1995). "Dimensions of Situation Model Construction in Narrative Comprehension." Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21(2): 386-397.

Top

---

Copyright © 2007 HCI-Book
Developed at the University of Victoria
by the Electronic Textual Cultures Lab